Censoring Books Means Censoring Empathy – Orange County Register

By Victoria Wattle | Contributing Columnist

Back in 2011, while writing for The Wall Street Journal, Meghan Cox Guerdon started a heated debate about whether YA was too dark and explicit. Put simply, YA fiction represented either a bastion against censorship or a destroyer of adolescents who might otherwise avoid foul language, absenteeism, molestation, or suicide.

That debate was a hassle compared to today’s struggle over children’s books. Book censorship has reached the national stage. While previous censors feared the violence of The Hunger Games, today’s censors want to erase reality. Sexuality, sexual abuse, sexually transmitted diseases, race, oppression and slavery are prohibited. Parents can search school library catalogs for words like “gay” or “lesbian” (like one Spotsylvania County, VA, parent did) and request removal of titles they’re not at all familiar with.

As a former college professor and librarian, I find this brave new world alarming. Speaking to the Tennessee House of Representatives, country music star John Rich likened school librarians to pedophiles for including “obscene books” in their collections. Virginia state encourages whistleblowers to call hotline to report teachers whose materials are “divisive.” Texas, under the supervision of State Rep. Matt Krause, has compiled a list of over 800 suspect books. Journalist Karen Attiah notes, “It’s like someone typing in the keywords ‘Black’, ‘racism’, ‘LGBT’, ‘gender’ and ‘transgender’ and just pouring the results into a spreadsheet.” (I guess “Sex” was included in the keywords because “Everything you need to know about going to the OB/GYN” is on the list.)

Book censorship is far more menacing than it was 10 years ago because it is wiping out anyone who doesn’t look or think like the censor. Although anti-censorship parent groups are forming, many stigmatized students will not find books that validate their experiences. This is important. As the character of CS Lewis in William Nicholson’s Shadowlands says, “We read to know we are not alone.” Silencing diverse stories translates into trying to protect teenagers from uncomfortable narratives. A parent’s objection to the assignment of Toni Morrison’s “Beloved” in an AP literature class made me wonder: When should students learn difficult subjects? After all, the goal of AP courses is to earn college credit.

I recently did a random experiment with the last two YA novels I read, books I recommend to teenagers. Would they violate censorship? They are certainly in school libraries. Teacher librarians buy based on recommendations from professional journals such as School Library Journal. Both books received positive reviews. (Despite hysterical accusations, there’s little chance of truly obscene material ending up in the collection.)

Meg Haston’s The End of Our Story is about the breakup of a first love. But it also tackles family secrets, domestic violence, adolescent sexuality and profanity. “The End” creates a lot of uneasiness. It also creates empathy, an understanding that everyone is fighting a secret, difficult battle.

Released in 2017, the white characters in The End address issues that censors are now rallying against. However, I did not find it on the Texas Suspicious Books list, perhaps because it cannot be found by searching using the keywords listed above.

https://www.ocregister.com/2022/10/05/censoring-books-means-censoring-empathy/ Censoring Books Means Censoring Empathy – Orange County Register

Adam Bradshaw

TheHitc is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – admin@thehitc.com. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button